Inter-Regional Comparisons on the Quaternary Large Mammalian Faunas between China and Sub-Saharan Africa
基金项目:

This work was supported by the International Cooperation Program of MST of China (2009DFB20580); the Major Basic Research Project of MST of China (Grant No: 2006CB806400); Special Basic Research Project (Grant No: 2007FY110200) of MST of China, and the IVPP Project (Grant No: KA209508).


Inter-Regional Comparisons on the Quaternary Large Mammalian Faunas between China and Sub-Saharan Africa
Author:
  • TONG Haowen

    TONG Haowen

    1 Key Laboratory of Evolutionary Systematics of Vertebrates, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China; 2 Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3 Institute for Human Evolution, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa
    在期刊界中查找
    在百度中查找
    在本站中查找
  • HU Nan

    HU Nan

    1 Key Laboratory of Evolutionary Systematics of Vertebrates, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China; 2 Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3 Institute for Human Evolution, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa
    在期刊界中查找
    在百度中查找
    在本站中查找
  • LIU Jinyi

    LIU Jinyi

    1 Key Laboratory of Evolutionary Systematics of Vertebrates, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China; 2 Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3 Institute for Human Evolution, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa
    在期刊界中查找
    在百度中查找
    在本站中查找
  • Ronald CLARKE

    Ronald CLARKE

    1 Key Laboratory of Evolutionary Systematics of Vertebrates, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China; 2 Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3 Institute for Human Evolution, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa
    在期刊界中查找
    在百度中查找
    在本站中查找
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    The current and dominant theory about the origin of modern humans is the out-of-Africa hypothesis, which asserts that populations of Homo sapiens left Africa 100,000 years ago and replaced indigenous populations of humans in Eurasia. Many scholars equated the out-of-Africa dispersal of humans with paleoenvironmental changes. However, until now, few have paid special attention to the faunal data and whether or not faunal patterns are supportive of the popular theory. Recent comparative study of the Chinese fauna shows that the communication of faunas between Africa and East Asia could have occurred during the Neogene, but it was very limited during the Pleistocene. In the Chinese Quaternary fauna, only 16% of the genera are also present in the sub-Saharan African fauna. There is also no element among the dominant taxa of the Chinese Quaternary fauna which can be related to the African fauna. There is no reliable proof for the existence of Hippopotamus and Giraffa, as well as Panthera leo, during the Quaternary in China. Two controversial taxa are Acinonyx and Crocuta, about which there is still argument concerning their species identification in Eurasia. It is possible that both of the genera have co-specific taxa in Africa and Eurasia. Although the two genera are confined to Africa today, they did have a long evolutionary history in China. For the Out of Africa hypothesis for Homo sapiens, the implications of the limited faunal interchanges between China and Africa are not completely clear yet.

    Abstract:

    The current and dominant theory about the origin of modern humans is the out-of-Africa hypothesis, which asserts that populations of Homo sapiens left Africa 100,000 years ago and replaced indigenous populations of humans in Eurasia. Many scholars equated the out-of-Africa dispersal of humans with paleoenvironmental changes. However, until now, few have paid special attention to the faunal data and whether or not faunal patterns are supportive of the popular theory. Recent comparative study of the Chinese fauna shows that the communication of faunas between Africa and East Asia could have occurred during the Neogene, but it was very limited during the Pleistocene. In the Chinese Quaternary fauna, only 16% of the genera are also present in the sub-Saharan African fauna. There is also no element among the dominant taxa of the Chinese Quaternary fauna which can be related to the African fauna. There is no reliable proof for the existence of Hippopotamus and Giraffa, as well as Panthera leo, during the Quaternary in China. Two controversial taxa are Acinonyx and Crocuta, about which there is still argument concerning their species identification in Eurasia. It is possible that both of the genera have co-specific taxa in Africa and Eurasia. Although the two genera are confined to Africa today, they did have a long evolutionary history in China. For the Out of Africa hypothesis for Homo sapiens, the implications of the limited faunal interchanges between China and Africa are not completely clear yet.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

TONG Haowen, HU Nan, LIU Jinyi, Ronald CLARKE.2011. Inter-Regional Comparisons on the Quaternary Large Mammalian Faunas between China and Sub-Saharan Africa[J]. ACTA GEOLOGICA SINICA(English edition),(1):91~106

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2010-10-01
  • 最后修改日期:2010-11-30
文章二维码