川西南山区几种典型沉积物的粒度与粒形特征研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.应急管理部国家自然灾害防治研究院;2.四川省地震局;3.四川省地球物理调查研究所;4.成都理工大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目)42271017,


Study on the grain size and shape of several typical sediments in the southwest mountains of Sichuan Province, China
Author:
Affiliation:

1.National Institute of Natural Hazards;2.Sichuan Seismological Bureau;3.Sichuan Geophysical Survey Institute;4.Chengdu University of Technology

Fund Project:

单位:
  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    量化天然沉积物粒度与粒形特征是研究物源区物质组成、风化剥蚀环境、搬运和沉积动力条件的重要方面,存在多种基于不同原理的测试技术和数据处理方法。图像法通过对样品大量颗粒的逐个测量来评估样品总体粒径和粒形特征,是对样品粒度和粒形特征最直观的表达。本文基于对凉山州境内6个地点多种环境25个沉积样品的动态图像法和激光衍射法粒度分析结果,用数学矩法和图形法分别估算每个样品两种测试结果的均值粒径、分选系数、偏度和峰度等粒度统计参数,并对图像法所获粒形参数与粒径的关系进行探讨。结果表明,1. 两计算方法的均值粒径几乎一致,尤其是图像法数据以及激光法粒度的细粒样品部分几乎没有差别,两方法的分选系数强相关,但数学矩法通常更大。仅对于正态分布样品的偏度和峰度,图形法与数学矩法计算结果近似,对于非正态样品,图形法不能反映样品的真实偏度和峰度。2.激光法仅均值粒径与图像法存在中等相关性;以图像法为参照,其他高阶粒度参数与样品的实际情况几乎无关。3.两测量方法所获得粒度分布、峰态、峰位和峰值规模存在显著差异。与以往认为图像法平均粒径普遍大于激光法均值粒径的结论不同,本研究发现在山地环境部分样品激光法粒度比图像法更粗,推测主要与样品的多矿物属性和多形状不规则性有关。4.等积径-球度二维密度分布图可用于区分沉积物内部的不同颗粒簇,这些颗粒簇还可能具有不同的平面展布形态。结合形态参数,粒形信息可为沉积环境分析提供新的潜力和机会。

    Abstract:

    Quantifying grain size and grain shape of natural sediments is an important aspect of studying provenance material composition, weathering and denuded environment, dynamic conditions of transport and deposition. There are many testing techniques and data processing methods based on different principles. The image method evaluates the size and grain shape characteristics of the overall grains by the measurement of a large number of rains, and is the most intuitive expression of the size and shape characteristics of the sample’s grains. Based on the data of both dynamic image and laser size measurements, the mean size (Mz), sorting coefficient (Sd), skewness (Sk), kurtosis (Kg) of samples are calculated using both moment and graphic methods; and then the relationship between the grain shape and grain size obtained by image method were discussed. The main conclusions are as follows. (a) The Mz values of the two calculations are almost identical, especially for image method, and Sd values of the two calculations is strongly correlated. The graphic Sk and Kg approximate with the moment’s ones for the samples with near-normal distributions. however, deviates significantly from the moment’s value for non-normal samples. So, the graphic calculation cannot reflect the real skewness and kurtosis of the samples. (b) There exists a moderate correlation between Mz values of both image and laser measurements; but the Sd, Sk and Kg parameters from laser measurement are almost unrelated to those from image one. (c) There are significant differences between the grain-size distributions, including peak positions, height, and shapes of peaks, obtained from two measurements. Different from the previous view that image’s Mz is generally coarser than laser’s one, this study found that the laser’s Mz is coarser than the image one for some sediment, which, perhaps, is mainly related to the multi-mineral properties and multi-shape irregularities of the sample. (4). Diameter of the circle of equal projection area(EQPC)-spherical two-dimensional density distributions can be used to distinguish different grain clusters within the sediment, each clsuster may also have different planar spread patterns. Combined with morphological parameters, granular information can provide new potential and opportunities for deposition environment analysis.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-11
  • 最后修改日期:2024-06-06
  • 录用日期:2024-06-06
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: