铜矿床勘查工程间距探讨
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

本文为国家矿产资源储量技术标准体系建设项目子课题——重要有色金属与贵金属及稀土稀有矿床合勘查程度研究(编号:CB2015-2-5)


Discussing on Copper Deposit Exploration Engineering Spacing
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

单位:
  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了合理确定铜矿床勘查控制程度,为铜矿床勘查规范修订提供依据,作者收集了大量铜矿床勘查开发资料,开展探采对比研究。通过探采对比认为,现行《铜、铅、锌、银、镍、钼矿地质勘查规范》(DZ/T 02142002)确定的铜矿床勘查工程间距偏稀,需要适当调整,建议铜矿床第Ⅰ类型控制的勘查工程间距不变,第Ⅱ类型控制的勘查工程间距调整为80~100m× 60~100m,第Ⅲ类型控制的勘查工程间距调整为40~60m×40~60m,小型铜矿床勘查类型均确定为第Ⅲ类型。

    Abstract:

    Objectives: In order to reasonably determine the control degree of the exploration of copper deposits and provide a basis for the revision of the specifications for copper mineral exploration, the author have collected a large number of exploration and development data of copper deposits and conducted a comparative study on exploration and mining.Methods: Contrastive analysis of prospection and exploitation.Results: The copper deposit exploration engineering spacing slants spare in the current specifications for copper, lead, zinc, silver, nickeland molybdenum miaeral exploration(DZ/T 02142002),it need appropriate adjustments.Conclusions:We suggest that the exploration engineering spacing of the first type remain unchanged; the exploration engineering spacing of the second type is adjusted for 80~100m×60~100m, the exploration engineering spacing of the third type is adjusted for 40~ 60 m×40~60 m, the small copper deposit exploration types were identified as the third type.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

周旭林,傅群和,王宏宇,秦雅静.2018.铜矿床勘查工程间距探讨[J].地质论评,64(4):885-894,[DOI].
ZHOU Xulin, FU Qunhe, WANG Hongyu, QIN Yajing.2018. Discussing on Copper Deposit Exploration Engineering Spacing[J]. Geological Review,64(4):885-894.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-07-18
  • 出版日期: