The dispute of whether there was a great glacial sheet on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau started at the beginning of the 1920s and has lasted for more than 80 years. The subjects of dispute include the question whether there was a great glacial sheet covering the whole plateau and small glacial sheets localy as well their formation ages and influence on the global climatic change. The dispute involved three stages;from the beginning of the 20th century to the 1940s, the dispute was mainly between a few explorers from western countries, but for lack of evidences, it was difficult to carry out the discussion; from the 1950s to 1970s, the hypothesis of the absence of the great glacial sheets proposed mainly by the Chinese scholars; the period from the 1980s up to now has witnessed a culmination of dispute when there have been numerous Chines and foreign scholars who take part in the dispute and published a few hundred papers on this subject. It is predicted that in the near future the dispute will calm down. There will appear a new research on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau upsurge and the research will enter a new era when a serier of new theories on the history of geological evolution of Tibet and Asia and is influences on the natural environment and ecological system of East Asia.
参考文献
相似文献
引证文献
引用本文
郑本兴 焦克勤.1995.青藏高原有无大冰盖之争的现状[J].地质论评,41(2):127-134,[DOI]. Zheng Benxing, Jiao Keqin, Zheng Wenlan.1995. THE STATUS QUO OF THE DISPUTE OF WHETHER THERE WAS A GREAT GLACIAL SHEET ON THE QINGHAI-TIBET PLATEAU[J]. Geological Review,41(2):127-134.