塔里木与四川盆地震旦系—寒武系油气成藏条件对比与启示
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

本文为中国科学院A类战略性先导科技专项(编号XDA14000000)和国家自然科学基金项目(编号U19B6003,U20B6001,9175520021)联合资助的成果。


Insights from a comparison of hydrocarbon accumulation conditions of Sinian- Cambrian between the Tarim and the Sichuan basins
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    塔里木盆地与四川盆地是中国海相深层6000 m以深油气勘探的重点地区,已发现多个深层—超深层大中型油气田,而且有一批重点探井见到了良好的油气显示,预示着该领域有巨大的勘探潜力。本文从沉积建造和后期构造改造两个方面对比了塔里木盆地和四川盆地震旦系—寒武系油气成藏条件,并依据勘探与研究进展,提出了深层—超深层油气勘探建议。研究认为:塔里木盆地与四川盆地深层震旦系—寒武系油气成藏条件具有“建造相似、改造有别”的特征,震旦纪—寒武纪两个盆地具有相似的大地构造背景,受到了相似的全球性古海洋、古气候和古生物演变的影响,都经历了陆内裂谷盆地—克拉通盆地的演化,均发育下寒武统广覆式分布的优质烃源岩,发育上震旦统微生物丘白云岩和下寒武统台内滩白云岩优质储层以及中寒武统膏盐岩盖层。寒武纪之后,特别是中新生代以来两个盆地的构造改造出现了较大差异,主要体现在盆地热体制和沉积埋藏过程上,塔里木盆地古、今热流较低,平均为 35~60 mW/m2,四川盆地古、今热流值较高,平均为55~80 mW/m2;塔里木盆地总体表现为喜马拉雅期之前缓慢沉降、之后快速沉降,四川盆地总体表现为印支期—燕山早期快速沉降,燕山晚期之后整体隆升。受差异改造过程的影响,塔里木盆地深层—超深层油气藏后期改造较弱,主要发育原生油气藏,油气相态以油为主,多种相态并存,四川盆地后期改造较强,主要发育改造或者调整型气藏,几乎不存在液态烃类油气藏。从四川盆地已发现的油气成藏来看,震旦系—寒武系油气藏具有“近源断裂输导、岩性圈闭控藏、局部构造控富”的特征。受此启发,塔里木盆地深层震旦系—寒武系勘探应该重视岩相古地理的刻画,在下寒武统玉尔吐斯组烃源岩落实的基础上,寻找受高能相带控制的岩性圈闭是下一步勘探的重点。

    Abstract:

    The Tarim and the Sichuan basins with burial depths of over 6000 m are the key areas for marine deep oil and gas exploration in China. Many large and medium- sized deep and ultra- deep oil and gas fields have been discovered, and a number of key exploration wells have good oil and gas indicators confirming that there is still great exploration potential in this field. In this study, the hydrocarbon accumulation conditions of Sinian- Cambrian in the Tarim and the Sichuan basins are compared from the perspective of sedimentary formation and later structural transformation. Based on the recent exploration and research progresses, the deep to ultra- deep hydrocarbon exploration proposals are set forth. The results show that the hydrocarbon accumulation conditions of the deep Sinian- Cambrian in the Tarim and the Sichuan basins have the characteristics of “similar formation〖JP〗 and different transformation”. The two basins had similar tectonic settings during Sinian- Cambrian and were affected by the same global paleoceanographic, paleoclimatic and paleontological evolution. Both experienced the transformation from intra- continental rift basin to craton basin, and developed high- quality source rocks of the lower Cambrian with wide coverage, high- quality reservoirs of microbial mound dolomite of the upper Sinian and intra- platform shoal dolomite of the lower Cambrian dolomite, and gypsum- salt cap rocks of the middle Cambrian. After Cambrian, especially since Mesozoic and Cenozoic, there are great differences in the structural transformation of the two basins, mainly reflected by the basin geothermal system and sedimentary burial process. The paleo and present heat flow of the Tarim basin is relatively low, with an average of 35~60 mW/m2, while that of the Sichuan basin is relatively high, with an average of 55~80 mW/m2. The Tarim basin is characterized by slow subsidence before the Himalayan Period, and rapid subsidence afterwards. The Sichuan basin is characterized by rapid subsidence in the early Indosinian- Yanshanian Period and uplift after the late Yanshanian Period. Affected by the process of differential transformation, the late transformation of deep and ultra- deep reservoirs in the Tarim basin is weak, mainly developing primary reservoirs, with oil as the main phase and multiple coexisting phases. While the late transformation in the Sichuan basin is strong, mainly developing transformation or adjustment type gas reservoirs, there are almost no liquid hydrocarbon reservoirs. According to the discovered oil and gas accumulation in the Sichuan basin, the Sinian- Cambrian oil and gas reservoirs are characterized by “near source fault controlled transport, lithologic trap controlled reservoir, and local structure controlled enrichment”. Inspired by this, the deep Sinian- Cambrian exploration in the Tarim basin should put emphasis on the description of lithofacies and paleogeography, and on the basis of the implementing the source rocks of lower Cambrian Yurtus Formation, the future exploration focus should be on finding lithologic traps controlled by high energy facies belts.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

孙冬胜,李双建,李建交,李英强,杨天博,冯小宽,李慧莉,韩作振,何治亮.2022.塔里木与四川盆地震旦系—寒武系油气成藏条件对比与启示[J].地质学报,96(1):249-264.
Sun Dongsheng, Li Shuangjian, Li Jianjiao, Li Yingqiang, Yang Tianbo, Feng Xiaokuan, Li Huili, Han Zuozhen, He Zhiliang.2022. Insights from a comparison of hydrocarbon accumulation conditions of Sinian- Cambrian between the Tarim and the Sichuan basins[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,96(1):249-264.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-28
  • 最后修改日期:2021-11-14
  • 录用日期:2021-11-15
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-02-28
  • 出版日期: