大兴安岭黄岗梁火山构造隆起西南段火山岩相、火山构造格架与火山作用过程重溯
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

本文为中国地质调查局地质矿产调查评价项目(编号DD20190001)和国家重点研发计划重点专项项目(编号2017YFC0601301)资助成果。


Volcanic lithofacies, volcanic tectonic framework and volcanism process in the southwestern segment of Huanggangliang volcanic structural uplift in Great Xing’an Range, NE China
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    火山机构是一切火山岩的源头和绝大多数火山岩、火山岩相的赋存空间,是陆相火山岩区地质调查与研究的中心。本文选择大兴安岭黄岗梁火山构造隆起西南段,通过典型火山机构内火山活动时序的建立和不同火山机构相互关系的厘定,恢复火山构造格架,重溯火山作用过程。研究揭示黄岗梁火山构造隆起西南段包括两个火山隆起、三个破火山、一个凝灰岩环,以及若干个小的火山口,它们之间或并列、或叠套、或切割、或覆盖,构成了复杂的火山构造样式。区内火山活动大致可分为早期、峰期和晚期三个演化阶段,不同阶段在火山作用方式、形成的火山机构类型及主要岩性组合各具特色:早期火山作用主要形成瓦窑沟火山隆起,火山活动除开始阶段有一定烈度的爆发外,喷发强度总体中等偏低,形成产物以溢流相的安山岩和火山颈相的安山玢岩为主;峰期火山作用主要表现为大规模爆发,强烈爆发后塌陷形成多个破火山;晚期火山作用主要表现为压低沸腾外溢?侵出?侵入,形成黄岗梁火山-侵出隆起,火山活动烈度是三期中最弱的。三期火山作用产物的SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄分别为143.7±1.5 Ma、140.1±1.4 Ma和141.1±1.0 Ma,在误差范围内几乎一致,说明黄岗梁火山构造隆起西南段火山活动持续的时间很短,其形成时代对应国际地质年代表为早白垩世贝利阿斯期(Berriasian),部分可能延续到凡兰吟期(Valanginian)初。区域对比表明,大兴安岭南段晚中生代的火山活动主要有两幕,峰值分别为?156 Ma和?132 Ma,中间有约10 Ma的相对宁静期,黄岗梁火山构造隆起形成于宁静期结束后,火山活动重新活跃的发展阶段。大兴安岭南段与北段具有不完全一致的火山活动年龄谱,暗示南、北两段火山作用的动力学机制可能存在着差异。前者与华北北缘晚中生代的火山活动具有可比性,可能与古太平洋板块的俯冲及随后俯冲板片的后撤有关;后者则可能与蒙古-鄂霍茨克洋的俯冲闭合及造山后的伸展有关。

    Abstract:

    Volcanic edifices are the source of all volcanic rocks and the space where most volcanic rocks and volcanic facies occur. They are the center of geological survey and research in continental volcanic rock areas. In this paper, we select the southwestern part of the Huanggangliang volcanic tectonic uplift in the Great Xing’an Range, through the establishment of volcanic activity sequence in the typical volcanic institutions and the determination of the relationship between different volcanic institutions, the volcanic structure framework in the area is restored and the volcanic process is traced back. The study reveals that the southwest part of Huanggangliang volcanic structural uplift consists of two volcanic uplifts, three caldera, one tuff ring and several small craters, which are juxtaposed, overlapped, cut or covered, forming a complex volcanic structural style. Volcanic activity in the area can be roughly divided into three stages: early, peak and late stages. Different stages have their own characteristics in volcanism, types of volcanic institutions and the main lithology. The early volcanism mainly formed the Wayaogou volcanic uplift, and the overall intensity of volcanic activity was medium low except for the eruption of certain intensity in the initial stage. The products formed are mainly overflow facies andesite and volcanic neck facies andesite porphyry; the peak volcanism was mainly characterized by large- scale eruption and collapse after strong eruption to form a number of calderas; the late volcanism is mainly manifested as boiling- overflow, extrusion, intrusion, forming Huanggangliang volcano- extrusion uplift, the intensity of volcanic activity is the weakest of the three phases. The SHRIMP zircon U- Pb ages of the third- stage volcanism products are 143.7±1.5 Ma, 140.1±1.4 Ma and 141.1±1.0 Ma respectively, which are very close within the error range, indicating that the volcanic activity in the southwest part of Huanggangliang volcanic tectonic uplift lasted for a very short time, and its formation age corresponds to the early Cretaceous Berriasian represented by the International Geological year, and some of them may last until the early Valanginian. Regional comparison shows that the late Mesozoic volcanic activity in the southern part of the Great Xing’an Range mainly includes two episodes, with peaks of ~156 Ma and ~132 Ma respectively, with a relatively quiet period of about 10 Ma in the middle. The Huanggangliang volcanic tectonic uplift formed after the quiet period, and the volcanic activity was reactivated. There are different age spectra of volcanic activity in the southern and northern parts of the Great Xing’an Range, suggesting that there are differences in the dynamic mechanism of volcanism between the two parts. The former is comparable to the late Mesozoic volcanic activity on the northern margin of North China, which may be related to the subduction of the paleo- Pacific plate and subsequent retreat of the subducted slab, while the latter may be related to the closure of the Okhotsk Ocean.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

薛怀民,曹光跃.2021.大兴安岭黄岗梁火山构造隆起西南段火山岩相、火山构造格架与火山作用过程重溯[J].地质学报,95(3):643-666.
Xue Huaimin, Cao Guangyue.2021. Volcanic lithofacies, volcanic tectonic framework and volcanism process in the southwestern segment of Huanggangliang volcanic structural uplift in Great Xing’an Range, NE China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,95(3):643-666.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-07
  • 最后修改日期:2021-02-04
  • 录用日期:2021-02-05
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-02-20
  • 出版日期: