膏盐层在云南会泽和毛坪铅锌矿成矿中的作用:硫同位素证据
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

中国地质大学北京,中国地质科学院矿产资源研究所,国家地质实验测试中心,昆明理工大学,中国地质科学院矿产资源研究所,中国地质科学院矿产资源研究所

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Effect of Sulfate Evaporate Salt Layer in Mineralization of the Huize and Maoping Lead-Zinc Deposits in Yunnan: Evidence from Sulfur Isotope
Author:
Affiliation:

China University of Geosciences (Beijing),Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences,National Research Center for Geoanalysis,Kunming University of Science and Technology,Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences,Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    云南会泽和毛坪铅锌矿床位于扬子地块西南缘川滇黔铅锌多金属矿集区的中南部,小江断裂带、昭通曲靖隐伏断裂带和垭都紫云断裂带的构造复合部位,是我国著名的MVT型铅锌矿床。本文以会泽和毛坪铅锌矿为例,系统研究了矿床中矿石硫化物、矿区相关碳酸盐岩地层中微量硫酸盐(CAS)以及外围不同时代膏盐层中石膏的硫同位素组成,探讨了膏盐层在云南会泽和毛坪铅锌矿成矿中的作用。会泽矿床矿石硫化物的δ34SVCDT值为11.0‰~20.0‰,多数集中在13.0‰~17.0‰之间,平均14.7‰,大致代表总硫的同位素组成。石炭系碳酸盐岩地层中微量硫酸盐的δ34SVCDT值为10.4‰~18.6‰,平均13.1‰,较矿石硫化物的值稍低。矿区外围石炭系膏盐层中石膏的δ34SVCDT值为12.9‰~17.1‰,平均13.6‰,与石炭系碳酸盐岩中微量硫酸盐的δ34SVCDT值几乎完全一致。毛坪矿床矿石硫化物的δ34SVCDT值与其赋存层位密切相关,赋存于摆佐组(C1b)的矿石硫化物的δ34SVCDT值为7.1‰~17.5‰,平均12.8‰,较会泽矿石硫化物的值稍低,与石炭系碳酸盐岩地层中微量硫酸盐和石膏的值一致;赋存于宰格组(D3zg)的矿石硫化物的δ34SVCDT值为18.3‰~22.7‰,平均21.1‰,与赋存于摆佐组(C1b)的矿石硫化物的值和会泽矿床矿石硫化物的值明显不同。矿区外围宰格组(D3zg)膏盐层中石膏的δ34SVCDT值为21.9‰~25.9‰,平均23.6‰,与毛坪矿床宰格组(D3zg)矿石硫化物的值相似。通过对比会泽、毛坪矿床中不同赋矿层位矿石硫化物、石炭系不同层位碳酸盐岩中微量硫酸盐和矿区外围不同时代膏盐层中石膏的硫同位素组成及变化规律,提出会泽、毛坪铅锌矿床矿石硫化物中的硫主要来源于赋矿层位膏盐层中石膏硫酸盐的热还原。其中会泽铅锌矿的硫绝大部分来自石炭系膏盐层,只有10%的硫来自下伏的宰格组膏盐层;毛坪铅锌矿床中赋存于宰格组的矿体,矿石硫主要来自宰格组膏盐层,而赋存于摆佐组的矿体,矿石硫主要来自摆佐组膏盐层,即膏盐层是在原地被还原的。成矿作用分为两个阶段,第一阶段石膏与甲烷等有机质发生热化学反应,全部被还原形成H2S,储存在层间裂隙或溶洞之中,同时发生大规模白云岩化;第二阶段淋滤了深部基底岩石中Pb、Zn等金属成矿物质的成矿流体与储存在层间裂隙或溶洞之中的富含H2S的流体混合,形成黄铁矿、方铅矿和闪锌矿等富集沉淀,形成高品位矿石。

    Abstract:

    The Huize and Maoping deposits, the famous highgrade Mississippi Valleytype leadzinc deposits in China, are located in the central south of the SichuanYunnanGuizhou leadzinc polymetallic ore cluster area in the southwestern margin of the Yangtze block and tectonically in structural composite area of Xiaojiang fault zone, ZhaotongQujing hidden fault zone, and Yadu Ziyun fault zone. This study discussed effect of sulfate evaporate salt layer on leadzinc mineralization of the Huize and Maoping deposits using sulfur isotope compositions of sulfides and gypsum from the two deposits. δ34SVCDT value of the Huize ore sulfides ranges from 11.0‰ to 20.0‰ (averaging 14.7‰), with most concentrated in 13.0‰~17.0‰, roughly representing total sulfur isotopic composition. δ34SVCDT value of the carbonate associated sulfate ranges from 10.4‰ to 18.6‰ (averaging 13.1‰),slightly lower than the ore sulfides. δ34SVCDT value of the gypsum in the Carboniferous gypsum salt layer ranges from 12.9‰ to 17.1‰ (averaging 13.6‰), which is consistent with that of the carbonateassociated sulfate. δ34SVCDT value of the ore sulfides in the Maoping deposit is closely related to its occurrence layers. The δ34SVCDT value of the ore sulfides in the Baizuo Formation (C1b) ranges from 7.1‰ to 17.5‰,with an average of 12.8‰, which is slightly lower than carbonateassociated sulfate and gypsum in Carboniferous carbonate strata. The δ34SVCDT value of ore sulfides in the Zaige Formation (D3zg) ranges from 18.3‰ to 22.7‰, with an average of 21.1‰. The results are unlikely with the ore sulfides in the Baizuo Formation (C1b) or the Huize deposit. The δ34SVCDT value of the gypsum in the Zaige Formation (D3zg) ranges from 21.9‰ to 25.9‰, with an average of 23.6‰, which is slightly higher than sulfides in the Zaige Formation (D3zg). By comparing the sulfur isotopic compositions of the sulfides, sulfate and gypsum, we propose that the sulfur in the ore sulfides of Huize and Maoping lead zinc deposits mainly came from the sulfate in the ore bearing strata. In addition, sulfur in the ore sulfides of the Huize lead zinc deposit mainly came from Carboniferous gypsum salt layer, with only 10% of the sulfur from the underlying Zaige Formation gypsum salt layer; while sulfur in the Zaige Formation ore sulfides of Maoping lead zinc deposit derived from the Zaige Formation gypsum salt layer, sulfur in the Baizuo Formation ore body mainly came from the Baizuo Formation gypsum salt layer, i e. the gypsum was reduced in situ. Collectively,we divided the metallogenic process into two stages. At the first stage, gypsum reacted with methane and/or other organic compositions forming hydrogen sulfide gas, which preserved in interlayer fissures or karst caves companied with large scale dolomization. At the second stage, ore forming fluids containing Pb, Zn and other metals leached from the basement rocks mixed with H2Srich fluids, resulting in precipitation of pyrite, galena, sphalerite and forming high grade ores.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

任顺利,李延河,曾普胜,邱文龙,范昌福,胡古月.2018.膏盐层在云南会泽和毛坪铅锌矿成矿中的作用:硫同位素证据[J].地质学报,92(5):1041-1055.
REN Shunli, LI Yanhe, ZENG Pusheng, QIU Wenlong, FAN Changfu, HU Guyue.2018. Effect of Sulfate Evaporate Salt Layer in Mineralization of the Huize and Maoping Lead-Zinc Deposits in Yunnan: Evidence from Sulfur Isotope[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,92(5):1041-1055.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-25
  • 最后修改日期:2018-04-16
  • 录用日期:2017-12-15
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-05-11
  • 出版日期: