华南晚中生代陆相地层年代及关系研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

南京大学地球科学与工程学院,南京大学地球科学与工程学院内生金属矿床成矿机制研究国家重点实验室,江苏省有色金属华东地质勘查局,江苏省有色金属华东地质勘查局

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划),国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目)


Geochronostratigraphy and Relationship of the Late Mesozoic Terrestrial Lithostratigraphic Units in South China
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University,State Key Laboratory of Mineral Deposit Research, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University,East China Mineral Exploration and Development Bureau,East China Mineral Exploration and Development Bureau

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    华南晚中生代陆相岩石地层单元的精确时代和对比一直存在争议。通过总结新近发表火山岩锆石UPb同位素年龄,在本次工作补充基础上,修订并厘定了华南赣杭带晚中生代陆相火山-沉积盆地中岩石地层单元的时代和关系,取得了5个方面的基本认识。①浙西磨石山群、建德群和永康群时代分别为早白垩世早-中期(~145~120 Ma、~140~115 Ma)和晚期(~125~105 Ma),显示形成有先后,有共存时段;建德群的劳村组、黄尖组、寿昌组之间,永康群的馆头组与朝川组之间存在同时异相的侧向叠加关系;中戴组下部年龄98 Ma指示衢江群始于晚白垩世初期;建德盆地经典寿昌剖面和丽水盆地经典老竹剖面均由两个相似的地层层序重复组成。②闽西永安盆地发育赣杭带晚中生代最老地层,兜岭群形成于晚侏罗世-早白垩世早期(~162~125 Ma),石帽山群主体构建于早白垩世中晚期(~135~95 Ma),赤石群的沙县组时限为Aptian晚期Cenomanian早期(~115~93 Ma),白牙山组存在时限甚短(~100~97 Ma),崇安组可能晚于~100 Ma;坂头组与下渡组之间,寨下组与黄坑组之间,沙县组、均口组、崇安组及白牙山组之间并非单一上下关系,大多存在侧向叠加的同时异相现象。③赣东武夷群建造于早白垩世早期(~145~125 Ma),火把山群沉积晚于Aptian早期(~122 Ma),赣州群初始沉积时间可能晚于Albian早期(~110 Ma),圭峰群可能始于晚白垩世初期(~100 Ma之后);打鼓顶组、鹅湖岭组、石溪组之间,河口组与塘边组之间主体为同时异相建造,侧向叠加可能性甚大;罗塘组、冷水坞组和周家店组,河口组与莲荷组分别可能为同物异名。④赣杭带晚中生代地层演化可分为3个阶段:Ⅰ早白垩世早期火山地层阶段,Ⅱ早白垩世晚期火山-沉积地层阶段,Ⅲ-晚白垩世沉积地层阶段,相应时期的地层记录或许可以各自用一个超群统名,这3个地层演化阶段一定程度上反映了3个构造演化阶段。⑤赣杭带火山-沉积盆地“组”岩石地层单元广泛的侧向叠加同时异相关系表明,有必要对华南晚中生代陆相地层上下和侧向关系进行重新审视。

    Abstract:

    The precise age and correlation of the Late Mesozoic terrestrial lithostratigraphic units in South China have long been in dispute. Based on the summary for the zircon UPb isotope age data of volcanic rocks published in recent years, along with complementary work in this study, this study revised and determined the ages and relationship of the lithostratigrapic units in the Late Mesozoic terrestrial volcanosedimentary basin in the GanHang tectonic zone, South China. Some preliminary understanding in five aspects has been made as follows. (1) In western Zhejiang, the Moshishan Gr (Group), Jiande Gr, and Yongkang Gr were probably formed in early and middle Early Cretaceous (~145~120 Ma and ~140~115 Ma), and late Early Cretaceous (~125~105 Ma), respectively, indicating they formed in a chorological order with parts coexisting. Laterally superimposed relation occurs among the formations of the Jiande Group and the formations of the Yongkang Group. The age (98 Ma) of zircons from the lower Zhongdai Formation indicates that the Qujiang Group had started since the beginning of Late Cretaceous. The two typical sections, located at Shouchang of Jiande basin and Laozhu of Lishui basin respectively, all consist of two similar stratigraphical sequences. (2) The Yong’an basin in western Fujian may have the oldest stratum record in Late Mesozoic era, with the Douling Group forming in Late Jurassic to early Early Cretaceous (~162~125 Ma) and the Shimao Formation in middle to late Early Cretaceous (~135~95 Ma). The Shaxian Fm of the Chishi Gr has a time range from late Aptian to early Cenomanian (~115~93 Ma), the Baiyashan Fm has a short age duration (~100~97 Ma), and the Chong’an Fm could have not started until ~100 Ma. The study suggest that not only an updown relationship but also more coeval different lithofacies with lateral progradation occur between the Bantou Fm and Xiadu Fm, the Zhaixia Fm and Huangkeng Fm, and among the Shaxian, Junkou, Baiyashan and Chong’an formations. (3) In eastern Jiangxi, the Wuyi Gr formed in early Early Cretaceous (~145~125 Ma), the Huobashan Gr might no begin until the early Aptian (~122 Ma), the Ganzhou Gr could be deposited after early Albian (~110 Ma), and the Guifeng Gr might start in early Late Cretaceous (after~100 Ma). The study suggests that the main sequences among the Daguding, Eheling and Shixi formations, and Hekou and Tangbian formations are contemporaneous heterotopic facies in different environment, likely with lateral superimposition. While the Luotang, Lengshuiwu and Zhoujia formations, and Hekou and Lianhe formations are probably the same sequences but named differently. (4) The Late Mesozoic strata in the GanHang tectonic zone can be classified into three stages: stage I, the early Early Cretaceous volcanic squence; stage II, the late Early Cretaceous volcanosedimentary squence; and stage III, the Late Cretaceous sedimentary squence. Corresponding sequence record may be grouped into one supergroup, and the evolution stages of three strata to some extent reflect three tectonic evolution stages. (5) The extensive lateral superimposition and facies elationship of lithostratigraphic units of formations in the GanHang volocanosedimentary basin suggests that it is necessary to revise and reinterpret the successive and progradational relationships of the late Mesozoic terrestrial lithostratigraphic units in South China.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李祥辉,张朝凯,王尹,刘玲.2018.华南晚中生代陆相地层年代及关系研究[J].地质学报,92(6):1107-1130.
LI Xianghui, ZHANG Chaokai, WANG Yin, LIU Ling.2018. Geochronostratigraphy and Relationship of the Late Mesozoic Terrestrial Lithostratigraphic Units in South China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,92(6):1107-1130.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-02
  • 最后修改日期:2017-10-27
  • 录用日期:2018-06-11
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-06-15
  • 出版日期: