芦山地震前后龙门山断裂带西南段地应力状态对比分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

中国地质科学院地质力学研究所,中国地质科学院地质力学研究所,中国地质科学院地质力学研究所,中国地质科学院地质力学研究所,中国地质科学院地质力学研究所,中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

中国地质调查局项目


Comparative Analysis of Insitu Stress State in the Southwestern Segment of Longmenshan Fault Zone before and after Lushan Earthquake
Author:
Affiliation:

Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences,Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences,Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences,Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences,Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences,China University of Petroleum(Beijing),College of Geoscience

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    2013年4月20日芦山Ms7.0级地震后,为研究龙门山断裂带西南段震后的地应力状态,应用水压致裂法和压磁应力解除法在该区开展了2个钻孔的原地应力测量工作。测量结果显示硗碛测点在128~188 m深度范围内最小水平主应力的量值为10.47~18.47 MPa,最大水平主应力的量值为19.60~25.83 MPa,方向为N63°~85°W;天全测点在114~142 m深度范围内最小水平主应力的量值为5.20~7.73 MPa,最大水平主应力的量值为8.21~9.31 MPa,方向为 N59°W。两个测点水平主应力与垂直应力的关系均为σH>σh>σv,其中硗碛测点最大、最小水平主应力与垂直应力比值的平均值分别为5.27和3.01,天全测点最大、最小水平主应力与垂直应力比值的平均值分别为2.60和1.76,表明有利于逆断层活动。通过比较该地区芦山地震前后实测地应力状态,发现芦山地震后,龙门山断裂带西南段的北段(即邛崃大邑西-宝兴北-汶川南一带)和南段(即天全-荥经-泸定-康定一带)应力积累量增加。相同深度范围内,北段硗碛测点震后的应力大小要比地震前有明显的提高,这也与硗碛测点地应力监测结果一致。实测应力方向与震前基本一致,都为NWNWW。基于实测地应力资料,根据库伦破裂准则和Byerlee定律分析,位于北段的硗碛测点震前部分压裂段的最大水平主应力处于使断层滑动临界值的上下限之间,而地震后最大水平主应力则均已超过断层滑动临界值的上限。位于南段的飞仙关测点震前最大水平主应力均未达到断层滑动临界值的下限,而地震后天全测点的最大水平主应力则均处于使断层滑动临界值的上下限之间。采用最大剪应力(σ1-σ3)/2与平均应力(σ1+σ3)/2的比值μm(断层摩擦)参数评估研究区地应力的积累水平和地震危险性。震前硗碛测点μm的量值为0.16~0.72,平均为0.50,震后为0.71~0.81,平均为0.77。震前飞仙关测点μm的量值为0.31~0.35,平均值为0.32,震后天全测点μm的量值为0.53~0.57,平均值为0.55,两个研究区的 μm的量值均变大。分析认为芦山地震后龙门山断裂带西南段的北段和南段的应力积累量增加,都有发生断层滑动的可能性,尤其是北段。

    Abstract:

    Hydraulic fracturing and piezomagnetic overcoring insitu stress measurements were carried out in two boreholes in the southwestern Longmenshan Fault Zone to understand the current insitu stress state and stress change after the Lushan Ms 7.0 earthquake on the April 20th, 2013. Measurement results show that the maximum horizontal principal stress and minimum horizontal principal stress at the Qiaoqi borehole is 19.60~25.83 MPa and 10.47~18.47 MPa within the depth of 128~188 m, with an orientation of N63°~85°W; the maximum horizontal principal stress and minimum horizontal principal stress at the Tianquan borehole is 8.21~9.31 MPa and 5.20~7.73 MPa within the depth range of 114~142m, with an orientation of N59°W. Relationships between horizontal stress and vertical stress of the two measuring points are σH>σh>σv. The average ratios of maximum and minimum horizontal stress to vertical stress at the Qiaoqi borehole are 5.27 and 3.01 respectively. The average ratios of maximum and minimum horizontal stress to vertical stress at the Tianquan borehole are 2.60 and 1.76 respectively. The results that horizontal stress is higher than vertical stress will lead to a reverse fault activity. Comparison of insite stress states in this area before and after the Lushan earthquake suggests that after the earthquake the accumulation of stress of the unbroken active faults on both sides of the epicenter has been increasing. What's more, the stress magnitude at the Qiaoqi borehole improves significantly after the earthquake, which is in consistent with the monitoring results at the Qiaoqi. On the basis of insitu stress data and Coulomb faulting criterion, the maximum horizontal principal stress at Qiaoqi was between the minimum and the maximum of fault slip before the earthquake, and exceeded the maximum after the earthquake. The maximum horizontal principal stress at Feixianguan was lower than the maximum of fault slip before earthquake.μm, the ratio between the maximum horizontal principal stress \[(σ1-σ3)/2\] and average stress \[(σ1+σ3)/2\], can be used to evaluate the present stress accumulation level and the seismic risk. The preearthquakeμmvalue at Qiaoqi was 0.16~0.72, with an average of 0.50, and the postearthquake μm value at Qiaoqi is 0.71~0.81, with an average value of 0.77. The preearthquake μmvalue at Feixianguan was 0.31~0.35, with an average of 0.32, and the postearthquake μm value at Tianquan was 0.53~0.57, with an average value of 0.55.μm values in two study areas show a big difference. This study concludes that the stress in the northern and southern segments of the Longshan fault zone has been accumulated, which can increase possibility of fault slipping, especially in the northern segment.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

邱君,吴满路,范桃园,张重远,李冉,陈利忠.2017.芦山地震前后龙门山断裂带西南段地应力状态对比分析[J].地质学报,91(5):969-978.
QIU Jun, WU Manlu, FAN Taoyuan, ZHANG Chongyuan, LI Ran, CHEN Lizhong.2017. Comparative Analysis of Insitu Stress State in the Southwestern Segment of Longmenshan Fault Zone before and after Lushan Earthquake[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,91(5):969-978.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-14
  • 最后修改日期:2016-04-13
  • 录用日期:2016-05-16
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-05-16
  • 出版日期: