斜锆石LA ICP MS U Pb定年方法及应用
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

中国地质调查局地质调查项目


U Pb Dating Study of Baddeleyite by LA ICP MS: Technique and Application
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    对基性、超基性岩形成年龄进行精确测定一直以来都是同位素地质年代学领域比较棘手的科学难题。由于采用岩石中锆石的年龄来指示基性、超基性岩的形成年龄往往存在诸多争议,越来越多的研究人员将目光投向了斜锆石,所采用的测试手段以往多为热电离质谱(TIMS)或具有原位、微区优势的二次离子质谱(SIMS) U Pb测年方法,进入21世纪以来,有研究人员开始尝试采用发展迅速且潜力巨大的激光剥蚀等离子体质谱(LA ICP MS)技术进行斜锆石U Pb年龄测定。然而,斜锆石LA ICP MS U Pb定年方法仍处于探索阶段,相关方法论方面的研究也是鲜有报道。本文对前人的斜锆石U Pb定年研究进行了综合评述,并报道探索开发出的一套新的LA ICP MS斜锆石U Pb定年方法。本文着眼于斜锆石LA ICP MS U Pb定年方法,探索适用于斜锆石的激光条件和质谱参数,以斜锆石标准样品Phalaborwa为研究对象,建立了适用于斜锆石的LA ICP MS U Pb定年测试方法,并将其应用于金川岩体中的斜锆石U Pb年龄测定中,得到了较为准确的年龄结果。本文依据“截距法”的理念编制了 “BUSTER”数据处理程序,并基于斜锆石Phalaborwa和金川岩体斜锆石两次测试结果将其与目前常用的基于“ROM法”或者“MOR法”的数据处理软件“Glitter”和“ICPMSDataCal”中的“无内标单外标”模块进行了系统比较。结果表明,就这两次测试的准确度而言,“BUSTER”要优于“Glitter”和“ICPMSDataCal”,但测试精度则不及后者,这与相关数值拟合优度及采用的误差传递策略不同有关。另外,本文利用SHRIMP方法对金川岩体中的斜锆石样品进行了测定,测试结果与采用本次研究所开发的斜锆石LA ICP MS U Pb定年方法得到的测试结果在误差范围内一致。

    Abstract:

    Accurate determination for formation age of mafic or ultramafic rocks has long been one of the most difficult scientific problems in isotopic geochronology. Due to much controversy on using the age of zircon as magmatic crystallization age of mafic or ultramafic rocks, a growing number of researchers have turned to obtaining the age of baddeleyite. The approaches commonly used before are thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) or secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) U Pb isotopic dating. With the entry into the 20th century, some researchers have tried to use laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA ICP MS) technology to obtain age of baddeleyite. However, the method is still at a trial stage and rarely reported as well. Here we summarized previous baddeleyite dating research and proposed a new dating method for age of baddeleyite by LA ICP MS. With this purpose, this study probed into laser condition and parameters of baddeleyite, finally establishing a dating method for baddeleyite using LA ICP MS U Pb. Application of this method in the sample from ultramafic rock in Jinchuan yielded an accurate dating result. Using the principle of “Intercept Method”, we worked out a new data processing program named BUSTER, which then were applied to baddeleyites from Phalaborwa and Jinchuan. The results were compared with those from other data processing softwares such as Glitter and ICPMSDataCal. The results show that BUSTER is better than Glitter and ICPMSDataCal in terms of accuracy but worse in precise, and this may be attributed to the different methods of numerical fitting and error transfer. In addition, this study also carried out SHRIPM analysis for the same sample (baddeleyite) from the Jinchuan complex, and the result has identical errors as the age using the LA ICP MS U Pb method.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李艳广,汪双双,刘民武,孟恩,魏小燕,赵慧博,靳梦琪.2015.斜锆石LA ICP MS U Pb定年方法及应用[J].地质学报,89(12):2400-2418.
Li Yanguang, Wang Shuangshuang, Liu Minwu, Meng En, Wei Xiaoyan, Zhao Huibo, Jin Mengqi.2015. U Pb Dating Study of Baddeleyite by LA ICP MS: Technique and Application[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,89(12):2400-2418.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-14
  • 最后修改日期:2015-10-20
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-12-23
  • 出版日期: