与天山造山带大地构造解释相关的两个地层问题
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目)


Two stratigraphic concerns on the Centra and northern Tienshan tectonic complex, Northwest China
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    内容提要: 1)综合分析巴音沟蛇绿混杂岩带(以下简称巴音沟混杂带)构造地层组合所含生物化石群性质,认为安集海组不存在特提斯型早石炭世Gigantoproductus为代表的腕足动物群;巴音沟混杂带蛇绿混杂岩上覆磨拉石相地层体,不应引用含义不清、成因和构造关系无直接联系的“科古琴山组”,而应使用同一构造沉积区带、构造相位关系一致、沉积组合类型相同的桃西沟群;由于巴音沟混杂带与达拉布特混杂带的构造地层组合序列、沉积类型、生物群和生物相类型发育的总体特征相似或相同,两者同属于准噶尔残留海盆最新缝合带性质。2)北天山和准噶尔地区延续至石炭纪末期的海洋环境,在早二叠世萨克马尔期至亚丁斯克期之前消失,区内从此进入陆内湖河相构造沉积阶段;出现于乌鲁木齐市艾维尔沟地区的芦草沟组是含有多门类陆相生物化石组合的陆相地层,并非海相成因浊积岩,它与准噶尔盆地东南缘广泛分布的芦草沟组的岩性和生物群特征相同,时代归属晚二叠世最早期。生物地层和古生态学研究结果不支持乌(鲁木齐)艾(维尔沟)公路106km处紧伏于克拉玛依组不整合面之下的地层属于晚二叠世深海相浊积岩(Xiao Wenjiao et al.,2008)的认定,也不支持将该不整合构造作为“天山造山带造山碰撞时代属于二叠纪末至三叠纪”证据之一的观察与结论,本文作者认为,塔里木板块的东北部早在石炭纪与二叠纪之交已完成与包括天山地块在内的西伯利亚晚古生代大增生体的拼接。

    Abstract:

    Two stratigraphic concerns on the Central and northern Tianshan tectonic complex, Northwest China Liao Zhouting 1), Chen Zhongqing 2), Liu Lujun1) 1) Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008; 2) School of Earth and Environment,The University of Western Australia,35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009,Australia Abstract. The present study addresses two tectonostratigraphic concerns on the Late Paleozoic Tienshan tectonic complex: (1) the stratigraphic succession of the Bayingou ophilite mélange and (2) the timing of tectonic accretion of the Siberian craton in the Aiweiergou area by integrating the relevant data of stratigraphy, palaeontology, tectonopalaeogeography and tectonopalaeobiogeography. In the Bayinggou area, the detailed palaeontological studies have rejected the presence of the brachiopod Gigantoproductus fauna of Early Carboniferous age in the Anjihai Formation. In contrast, the brachiopod assemblage suggests a Late Devonian age for the Anhinhai Formation. Integration of fossil assemblages and palaeogeographical and palaeobiogeographical settings indicates that the Bayingou area belongs to the eastern Junggar tectonic complex rather than the central-south Tienshan complex. The latter is characterized by the presence of Gigantoproductus fauna during the Early Carboniferous. Thus, the Bayinggou ophiolite mélange is late Devonian in age. The top of the stratal package of the ophiolite mélange should be re-assigned to the Taoxigou Group rather than the Keguqingshan Formation in view of lithological features and tectonostratigraphic provinces. The former was established to accommodate the stratal package of volcanics, conglomerates and mudstone in the Junggar block, while the latter is poorly defined for the conglomerates exposed in the western Tianshan areas. Accordingly, the Bayinggou ophiolite mélange succession comprises the late Devonian Anjihai Formation, the Carboniferous Bayinggou and Shadawang Formations, and the Taoxigou Group of Early Permian age. Xiao et al. (2008) figured an outcrop section showing a distinct angular unconformity between the Permian turbidite and the Middle-Upper Triassic red beds at the Aiweiergou area, about 110 km south of Urumqi, the capital city of Xinjiang Province, northwest China. These authors considered that this unconformity indicates the closure of the Tianshan Ocean and final tectonic accretion might have taken place between the latest Permian and the Triassic. However, the six-decade stratigraphic studies reveal that the Upper Permian in the Aiweiergou area does not represent a turbidite sequence, but comprises the terrestrial lake facies sandstone and mudstone of the Loucaogou Formation, yielding abundant non-marine fossils of plants, bivalves and gastropods. The overlying red beds comprise the conglomerate and sandstone and belong to the Kelamayi Formation. The unconformity between these two units is widely distributed in southern margins of the Junggar Basin, indicating a further tectonic uplift event during the Late Permian. The Aiweiergou area, however, has uplifted and became terrestrial settings during the Early Permian. Thus, Xiao et al.’s (2008) observation on the Permian and Triassic sediments and inference at the Aiweiergou section are incorrect. In fact, the molasse-type sediments of the Taoxigou Group are conspicuous at the basal part of the Permian successions at the Aiweiergou area. This unit is constrained as an Early Permian age by the macrofloral assemblage. The molasse succession therefore can be interpreted as the result of tectonic uplift due to the closure of the south Tianshan Ocean prior to the Early Permian. This tectonic inference agrees well with faunal assemblages from both sides of the South Tianshan complex and the previous tectonic studies at that region. Here, we infer that the closure of the South Tienshan Ocean and tectonic accretion of the Tianshan blocks might have taken place during the Late Carboniferous to Early Permian times.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

廖卓庭.2011.与天山造山带大地构造解释相关的两个地层问题[J].地质学报,85(6):925-937.
liao zhuoting.2011. Two stratigraphic concerns on the Centra and northern Tienshan tectonic complex, Northwest China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,85(6):925-937.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2011-01-17
  • 最后修改日期:2011-04-13
  • 录用日期:2011-04-15
  • 在线发布日期: 2011-05-20
  • 出版日期: